Echo JS 0.11.0

Not JavaScript.

YES WE KNOW

And the title doesn't match the linked page's one, FFS!

All correct methods. Now they only need benchmarks...

[Spam]

It's the fifth from the same user :(
Isn't it time to ban?

[Spam]

I can't believe your nerves, there's not even anything related to software development there!

How long before banning any news mentioning Chennai?

Unless they'll start with Chènnai, Chenna1 and the sort...

Congratulations!
Also for the new record on news posted in the last year!

How many comments, by the way?

Already posted.

> child.type.name.toString() === 'RadioButton'

Well, relying on the name of a function/class when your building workflow minifies your code is indeed an unfortunate decision.

Moreover, it sounds like an attempt to use JavaScript in a classic OOP way. Your correction relies on duck typing instead, and it's more in line with JavaScript's nature, which mean not checking what an object *is*, but what an object *does*.

That's not really "converting" to an image using jQuery. It's rather using jQuery to handle the canvas generated by html2canvas.