Echo JS 0.11.0

<~>

bevacqua comments

bevacqua 2468 days ago. link 1 point
Haha, same, please don't turn on HSTS! 301 redirects from HTTP would be fine for that, too.
bevacqua 2684 days ago. link 3 points
Generally you would do `foo?.bar?.baz || 1337`, unless `baz` was expected to sometimes have a significant falsy value.

I've talked about an idea to introduce `??` (from C#, null coalescing operator), which provides default values for undefined case only (not all of falsy), with which `foo?.bar?.baz ?? 1337` would be equivalent to the top line in your code.
bevacqua 2761 days ago. link 1 point
I appreciate that, but it cannot be a valid reason for being complacent.
bevacqua 2762 days ago. link 2 points
Also worth noting that the article doesn't address the benefits listed in a link he provides near the end, namely:

- It helps keep the naming consistent because all action types are gathered in a single place.
- Sometimes you want to see all existing actions before working on a new feature. It may be that the action you need was already added by somebody on the team, but you didn’t know.
- The list of action types that were added, removed, and changed in a Pull Request helps everyone on the team keep track of scope and implementation of new features.
- If you make a typo when importing an action constant, you will get undefined. This is much easier to notice than a typo when you wonder why nothing happens when the action is dispatched.
[more]